The Threat of Environmental Plights
A dominant characteristic of all beings to pursue their own interests, to promote the image of self-enrichment. In doing so, we face the environment with our production and our lifestyle of consumption. Moderate consumption and production of natural quiet environment to bring well-being. Less is more in moderation. But the question is whether these two sectors, improve human progress or stall. If they cause these improvements, they would not fight with the population growth tend to affect areas of life to potential degeneration. Not this commitment to production and consumption as intense as now, the spectacle of the production technology is – and, perhaps, should produce – items that delight the eyes and conscience that he might have initially expected. Ways of doing things have been very easy and pleasant by modern technology.
Procurement uncontrolled technology products is the result of natural charm, however, a sin is justified, because the production will go anyway to turn the wheels of consumption and employment. The survival of man is through the consumption pattern. It is undeniable that the production and consumption of technological products rampant than reasonable in most cases – and this is a central theme. Our progress we can see, based largely on the technological issue, but several effects related to a natural environment we are eager to use technology for development to continue as usual. It is the desecration of the environment! Technological progress, say, has not been conducive to the composition of the natural environment. This last operation was far more ruthless than should, therefore, we have the relationship between technological progress and the natural environment is inherently contradictory, or at best, unlike .. The more technology we have, the more degraded environment! Technology, in short, has come to set the tone for our individual and collective behavior, good or bad. And I say that expands on what I just said.
It is well known that the environment is all around us, some of which we should use, without fail, to keep us alive. An illustration of what the environment does for us and our knowledge is even more common. The life we need to breathe in and out of the air around us, drinking water from lakes, irrigate the land, the parties are using trees, plants, the grass for medicine, cut down trees for wood for construction, furniture and other things, traveling waterways and so on. These natural things that we use and the environment. We may have different forms of the natural things around us. It requires each command processing in the natural environment in different forms. In so doing, we produce a secondary environment, then we can run the original environment – a natural – Primary environment. There is no doubt that scientific and technological progress, the primary sector decreases while the secondary zone of expansion. This is not a guarantee and maintain good health but the first act. But if so, why the use of certain production techniques such attention is that they tend to the stability of the primary environmental risk?
There is a need felt by our people in our march to induce a primary zone, we are hemmed in. This environment is, of course, he – allegedly – fixed boundaries and therefore does not change its size. In contrast, human populations are constantly changing, they have no fixed boundaries. Populations continue to grow as live births to grow, so put all their weight, their pressure on the primary environment. It is logical and practical sense from a demand for strict environmental activist to claim that the purity of the primary area must be preserved, as well as human populations grow, for a fixed natural thing, a growing number something dynamic not kept inside all the while retaining the original form and content of the first.
Human progress and a growing need for sophisticated technology and its products is to be stored. If this is the reality we face, it seems as natural to the immediate environment will be gradually eroded. A strict environmentalist is good at this point. His position to defend the preservation of the original contents of the environment without realizing that this is only possible if human populations are invariably, they can not, and unless the consumer habits of related human with the base environment to adopt precisely the principle of balance, they can not. But stewardship of the natural environment in question can be!
A major challenge facing us, again and again, how we manage our consumption needs to vote – particularly our technology needs – a responsible manner that will leave connected to the first condition of the environment. This means that we must avoid – if possible – in our carelessness and waste consumption. Here is preferable to moderate excesses. But moderation is not in itself explain the issue of human happiness is not clear, either in terms of human progress.
May ask a question: what are the limits of moderation? How can we moderate our happy as possible and at the same time, the nature of progress that is desirable for us all – and collectively to achieve?
We used to measure progress in relation to the sophistication and convenience to do things that cause satisfaction and comfort. Suppose I could use an up-to-date Product Technology for implementation has been said, my instinct, or rather the feelings I can even encourage a much better product, even if the first is still in use. Consumption patterns usually follow this course, and producers are also encouraged to diversify, to modify and expand production to the tastes of all types of consumers, whose consumption of certain behaviors are specific to form.
The reality of consumption and production to remove our appreciation of logic, it surrounds the fog, the fog that kind of product, in turn, a sort of fuzzy logic. And it also shows how emerging human needs and how we humans strive to satisfy does not follow a strict sense, but we can understand and justify the correspondence between needs and satisfy them. If there is no logic to show the general pattern of consumption takes place in a large group of people, it has more emotional logic than anything else.
The point that environmental degradation tends to follow behind us is a problem that must be solved if human survival – and, of course, the promotion of human health – depends. The ultimate question depends on how the problem in a way that does not threaten the needs and fulfill them.
We can say that our needs and their satisfaction are logical parts of our essence. They give us the happiness we need, and they encourage us to what we as social beings and as beings who are constantly with primary and secondary environments on consumer issues, productivity and survival pure . Were all standard human needs, the question of planning in relation to their environment they are much easier.
As they are not uniform, the efforts of efforts elsewhere to make them uniform will generate distorted emotions, untold stress, perverse happiness and progress, among others. The focus will mean that we have to be machines. However, uniformity in human consumption and production is more or less, an ideal condition for an effective control environment. Perhaps a more suitable technique for the administration, his entourage and related institutions to manage and implement policies and legislation with ideas and invisible hands. This way of working not arouse public outrage. It is not nearby, attract public attention only recently developed tastes, needs, production and consumption are handled by the authorities in Mecca in the interest of preserving a healthy environment.
Now, ask any rational individual health or the environment must be maintained to the bankruptcy of human health, and they probably say yes. The question, again, how this can be done. If the answers are not forthcoming, go to the answer and they probably agree with you. Go further, asking if he / she is ready for consumption needs, production and related practices to reduce the function of the environment allows the spirit of welfare. The answer is, in principle, is without doubt an affirmative answer, but the differences in reality it is likely to occur. But why should there be exceptions if the person is aware that in doing so contribute to environmental degradation?
An important reason why we do not follow the principle of moderation in our production and consumption of more passion than logic in our individual and collective personality. A man may agree in principle that it must meet a number of specific actions to contributors to the health of the environment. Later still, he lost his company, because the force of his passion, as the logical priority of his character. Many of his acquired taste, because it is likely to leave his impulsive. And much of its excess of stress can come from solitude.
Bat Apathy or other types of social movements on human activity can cause stains personal response, which may purely entertainment, brief or prolonged. On these trips, it is normal for a place to go shopping. These are heady times buying can easily occur. For temporary or permanent disposal of its excess of stress comes from fans purchasing. Later, we realize that many things that were bought were really unnecessary. The error can not be reversed although the waste is pressure on the surrounding environment affects the quality. Moreover, the purchase makes impetuous, perhaps, an important part of consumer behavior that indicates the confidence the producers to increase production, although complementary products can not be justified for a population in need of other necessities of life. And the cycle continues!
The need to address environmental problems is urgently needed. Who can insist that we must use our rational tendencies forget that man’s emotions at the heart of many of our choices. Our egocentrism irreducible encourages mismanagement in our quest for funds from the primary environment for production and thus the lifestyle of consumption. The reason, and disappeared. In fact, human vulnerability to the mysteries of the environmental portrait, not clarity of purpose. But it is easy to understand why this situation continues impressive. But the desire to limit our excess of service requirements of reason more than passion.
What might be introduced by the authorities, other facilities and institutions that tend to minimize the emotional focus of human consumption patterns over a turbulent environment primary. Mere public education does not offer much in the long term practical solutions to the emotion-oriented consumer trends. The practical implementation of state structures – or, as mentioned previously, facilities and institutions – the emotional needs of men at work much better service. Instead of a large class of people who are driven by their emotions to a buying spree, they divert attention to the use of public facilities, institutions, overthrown egos back and stretch the turbulent passions . If the satisfaction of the population increases, then a careful public education, which urges us to be cautious in our consumption can be seen as a remarkable success. Solutions to environmental problems can largely remain in this ambitious effort.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Read more
« Water Pollution – The Problem of Our Century
Going Green – Reduce Your Carbon Footprint With a Virtual PBX »